Pascal vs hypex. The Hypex power rating is 380/700/700 watts at 8/4/2 ohms.
● Pascal vs hypex The Hypex modules measure better than Pascal modules. VTV AMPLIFIER Eight Channel Hypex 2XNC502MP+2XNC252MP NCore Amplifier 4X500W 4X250W $ 2,199. most of their datasheets show at least a couple of THD+N vs. I use Hypex n-cores for my amps. The VTV does look like a good option especially at less than There so many Class D options out there with Pascal vs Hypex vs Purifi, and then different variants of each. Amplification is a solved problem now that affordable class D Is there really enough difference between the top tier modular amps, today, to worry about or is it honestly about aesthetics of the box, the right name on the box and feeling good for the owner? Are any reasonably I had the chance to compare a handful of Class D amps a while ago, including a Hypex nCore (Nad M10), Purifi's Eval Amp (in their own red enclosure), along with a black sheep, a Pascal L-Pro2s - this against my own This essentially puts my decision at deciding between three of the newest/most regarded Class D amp modules: - Hypex Ncore (KJF Audio) - ICEpower ASX2 (Wyred 4 I’ve read in some threads the differences regarding Purifi, Pascal and Hypex but the buffer options were confusing. The Purifi 1ET7040SA DM Luc Dual Mono Amplifier and the Hypex NCx500 DM Lux Dual Mono Amplifier. Vidar is class AB and Hypex/Purifi are class D. The main difference is the spaciousness, 1200as fall flat here. Class-D amps like the Pascal chip designs from the likes of Amped Technologies and Jeff Rowland Design Group are a good $5,000 and $30,000 examples of how Class-D amps can be top performers in the modern audiophile world. But then I started looking at the other Stageline AMP's, and the 400D and 800D uses Hypex boards with Hypex SMPS's. 5K (ICE) sound different, but that's almost certainly down to implementation more than any single component. V. Member. Hypex amps seem pretty non-coloured in that they both have flat responses Not sure about Pascal but both the Purifi and Hypex Ncore based amplifiers will not have a "sonic signature" until you are clipping the amps. Distortion well below audibility. The self oscillating modulator waveform seems like it should be sinusoidal too. The 800D uses 2 UcD400OEM V7 modules and 2 Hypex SMPS400 V14 Jeff Bookwalter Columbus, Ohio, USA Foobar2000 with USB output to miniDSP Flex 8 for speaker crossover and EQ. This is a good white paper which explains the thinking behind Hypex NCore/Purifi :(PDF) All amplifiers are analogue, but some amplifiers are . Oct 9, 2020 #13 I want to stick with Class D for the form factor and reduced heat, and I'm love to get another Hypex-based amp (Wyred is Pascal, I believe, and it generates a lot of heat compared to the M27). But if you design a product there are many other factors like costs, support, package and ease of implementation. I’m currently eyeballing either a VTV or Buckeye 3-channel amp to drive my new Revel Be speakers (LCR). The Pascal however was much better in the controlling the low frequencies and has much better upper frequency extension. C. But at least one manufacturer uses the Pascal in a really expensive integrated because they feel the output The Hypex has a mid range warmth the Pascal does not, but seemed to be a bit rolled off on top. Purifi vs. VTV Purifi 1ET-6525SA; VTV Purifi High Power Modules: 1ET7040SA and 1ET9040BA; VTV PASCAL; VTV Multi Channel Amplifiers. Do people have a preference between these brands at this point? How do you all decide between who to go with. Most module modulators seem to have Output a triangular waveform. I have been looking at the Hypex VCD180 HG series which offers amazingly good value for money, it also gets very good reviews, Believe the Hypex, class-D DIY amplifier - UcD, universal class-D. There is no perceivable difference in sound quality. Blind testing with my ususal suspect goldenears. On the other hand, if I'm planning to keep this amp for a decade or longer (basically until it eventually breaks), would it be wiser to go for the better specs to future-proof it against any possible future upgrades of other Me either. I believe Hypex Electronics Chief Engineer Bruno Putzeys has stated that the very best MOSFETs are compatible with his The 535 which uses an inexpensive $400 Pascal module is $5,900. 2008-10-26 2:14 pm #2 2008-10-26 2:14 pm #2 wrong way around! Coming soon Hypex and purifi based amplifiers with custom buffer Icepower based amplifier options Pascal based amplifier options Based in USA Microaudio smps 12v trigger Micro controller based supervisory circuit for multichannel amps I am getting itchy about upgrading to a more powerful Hypex-based amplifier and I wonder whether there would be an obvious advantage on having the extra punch (apart from the possibility to upgrade to harder to driver speakers). The Hypex modules also have sophisticated non intrusive monitoring and protection circuitry for excess output current, dc and amp circuit failure. My personal opinion - Macs seem to match the retro aesthetic of your JBL's. This circles me back to the Price vs. I always thought that was an odd data point in their lineup. The Purifi is power rating is 250/500/950 watts at 8/4/2 ohms. But I see the Pascal modules use a modulator that outputs sine waves. The speakers have a sensitivity of 85 dB at 2. That it where Pascal shines and often got selected over Hypex. Pascal. Like your design they say it simplifies the filtering. g. They would probably charge $10,000 for a Purifi. That's when I ran into the IMG Stageline STA-1000D, that has Pascal modules. im considering either taking 7CH 1ET400A amp which also come with 2 power supplies and maybe bi amp the front speakers vs buying 5CH 1ET7040SA which comes with 1 power supply but newer purifi version. A more detailed view on the state of Class D is at the end of Class D Amp - Hypex vs. Compared to the stock monoblock configuration using the Hypex SMPS1200A180, the Micro Audio SMPS upgrade brings with it Active Power Factor Correction (for better efficiency), better thermal management (for longer max continuous power output), and higher power output (from 1200w to 1400w into 2ohm). Joined 2005. The difference between the Purifi and the Pascal is that the Pascal is not load invariant. Deleted member 15250 Guest. If How do the budget TPA amps on Amazon (a07) compare to the Hypex Ncore or ICEPower amps you can DIY in a GhentAudio case? Assuming the speakers are capable of resolving the detail, will the extra few hundred $ make a noticeable difference in sound? Archived post. Any feedback is much appreciated I actually had a Pascal based amp before I finally tried my first Hypex NCORE amp YES! The first live stream of this year! And we're going to make it another great one! This time: 3 x NEXT GEN class D. 00-VTV AMPLIFIER In this test of various digital amplifiers 2008 - Class D Amplifier comparasion test the Icepower was bottom of the pile. For now, we are focusing on Hypex NC252MP to see how it will turn out. It’s still crazy quiet and efficient, plus it has higher output capacity for the $$ and when used with an AVR (with lower pre-out Similar to its competitors Pascal (also from Denmark), Hypex (from the Netherlands), Infineon (Germany) and TI (USA), it has a special focus on high-end audio. I am wanting a neutral souding amplifier which the Hypex and Purifi are both reported to be and most discussions claim that you can't Hi all, can we expect a test how these GaN-based newcomers perform against top-class classD-s like e. I guess Dutch&Dutch 8C is using S-PRO for the same reason. They are fully bridged output, unlike n-cores. We see that from 5 kHz, the response of the amplifier is changing with the load attached. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. Both are budget champions with the Vidar going for $699 USD and Buckeye Amp (Hypex) NC252MP 2 channel for $579 USD & (Purifi) 1ET400A 2 channel amp for $1189 USD. The latest Hypex Nilai, the latest ge Thanks for sharing. All of those are well beyond the capability of human hearing. The sound quality in mids/highs is better on n-cores IMHO. But with options that offer up to 500W per channel it's not all that likely you will be clipping very often. One I also cross-shopped Hypex vs. 00-VTV AMPLIFIER Four Channel Hypex NC252MP NCore Amplifier 4x250W in Rack Mount Chassis $ 1,149. (They have a habit of running VTV Hypex. The Nilai’s greater naturalness, flow, harmonics and decay became even more pronounced replaying your flac files There's also Pascal which is used in the Trickfish Bullhead 1K amps, but none of their other models, all of which use ICE modules. Performance issue Still most class D manufacturers (ICEpower, Hypex, Purifi, Pascal) share their module's datasheets on their website, made with Audio Precision too, so there is not much of a surprise when Amir measures them. Many users report the B1K (Pascal) and the B. But from my understanding, these modules are as basic as Pascal Class D modules can be. I suppose I would need to use both modules on a few gigs to hear whether there is any kind of significant audible difference. I have no idea how accurate this test was though. The Ice Power can be downloaded from here, ICEpower — Speaker Engine Solutions. Then you add in the buffer and opamp options, different wattage According to Putzeys, the Eingentakt’s specs speak to its audible performance, apparently a considerable step up from the nCore modules that he developed for Hypex. Linkwitz LX521 speakers modified by using Seas Excel W22 8" drivers and Linkwitz Orion bass module (Peerless 830452 woofers) in lieu of the U22 8" drivers and the Seas W26 woofers. D. . Since the speaker impedance is far to be flat, some frequencies above 5 kHz will be emphasized (high speaker impedance), others attenuated (low speaker impedance Pricing that out, it would be $1200 USD after conversion and shipping for a 3CH NCxxxMP setup from Nord vs. ~$1700 USD after conversion and shipping for a 3CH NC400 setup. Thanks for sharing. The price difference between Purify and Hypex is around 15% in favor of the latter, ICEpower costs almost half as much as the others and therefore inside a fair comparison it's not negligible, and it is the one that sounds "worse" according to the review's author. Darthprater Discussion starter 849 posts · Joined 2018 Add to quote; Only show this user #1 · Feb 9, 2024. The VCD180 HG from Hypex Electronics B. The relative scarcity of Hypex powered amps makes that unlikely. 00-VTV AMPLIFIER Eight Channel Hypex 2XNC252MP+2XNC122MP NCore Amplifier 2X250W + 6X125W $ 1,899. The difference between the Hypex and the others was clear enough via your youtube video and my ipad’s speakers. Then you add in the buffer and opamp options, different wattage ratings, how many channels per cabinet, and power supplies, and it It's true that Hypex (nCore) might look a bit better on paper. The Hypex power rating is 380/700/700 watts at 8/4/2 ohms. be vivid and saturated in some kind of tonal "colour" would be just making the mid-range louder for human consumption vs accuracy. There so many Class D options out there with Pascal vs Hypex vs Purifi, and then different variants of each. I moved the Icepowers to bass/subs where they do great. Jump to Latest 960 views 4 replies 5 participants last post by dfiler Mar 26, 2024. UcD; NCORE MP; NCOREx; NCORE; VTV Purifi. Purifi and as I dug deeper, Hypex made far more sense for home theater use. ~3dB variation between 2R and 8R at 20kHz. The Trickfish Bullhead Mini 500 also uses a Pascal power module. Then you add in the buffer and opamp options, different wattage ratings, how many channels per cabinet, and power supplies, and it gets tricky. calvert73. Eight Channel; Seven Channel; Six Channel; Five Channel; Four Channel; Three Channel; VTV GaN Amplifiers; Hypex Nilai DIY Audio Kits; Buffer Board & Discrete OpAmps Also vtv has the purifi 7040 modules in 3 channel and multi channel configurations and he also has the hypex ncore x in these same configurations with only 5 days of waiting for the product instead of 14-17 days with buckeye. NC400 ? BOSC From the site: Why Gallium Nitride (GaN)? GaN provides the following sonic/sound quality benefits over traditional silicon transistors: Less harshness Cleaner highs Better If you're interested in newer Class D "module" amplifier technology, you may want to take a listen to this Live A/B/C comparison of 3 different DIY Home Audio Class D "kit" amplifiers, which include Purifi Eigentakt modules, the newest Hypex Nilai 500 modules (update to the nCore), and an ICEpower amplifier, though I think this last one is using older versions of Office/Desktop: Roon -> Schiit Modius -> Schiit Saga -> Hsu Hi Pass crossover ->IOM Hypex 252MP -> Philharmonic Mini Monitor It may not measure quite as well as the others, but I doubt it would make ant difference to your listening enjoyment. My electronics is all old school. But I also got some icepowers 1200as/as2 . Further, the performance of the ICE modules is sufficient to minimize the curiosity. 83 v/1m and a nominal impedance of 6 Ohms. Hello guys, Actually I'm submitting this thread to use the wisdom of the crowd and hear the ideas about designing and building amplifiers based on Hypex/Purifi and possibly Pascal modules. frequency plots with different I my experience with my Pascal S-Pro2 it made a great difference not only to its previous state but also compared with other amplifiers. wiejfwfmbnchllnktwjqzifdzeqrorgicnhdjnvjnrvtvbetpixgarpbs