Status decision in process without review They will determine if we need any more information from you. Now it has been in 'Decision in Process' for more than 1 month. It means the ability to assess situations, weigh pros and cons, and select the most appropriate course of action. If Once a paper is submitted to a journal, authors eagerly wait for the editorial decision. As the status changed soon after review, this probably means that the AE has gone through the manuscript and decided not to send it for peer review. However, although the paper went under review on However, if the "Under review" referred to the external peer review, you can be hopeful. ” Decision in Process: This means that the editor is now determining a decision The status ‘Awaiting AE Recommendation’ means that, based on the peer reviewer (or technical editor review, in this case), the AE is making a decision on the paper. We made a decision We sent you our decision on your Supplemental Claim. Then, the status changed to Required Reviews Completed. Hi good day, I have submitted my article in energies (energies-3092655) on dated 21. Peer review is an integral part of scientific publishing that confirms the validity of the science reported. Does this mean my paper is likely to be rejected? I’m so anxious about this situation. Decision in process: The peer-review of your article has been completed, and the decision letter will be emailed to you shortly. When the status changed to “Decision in Process”, it meant that based on the peer review, the handling editor had made a decision on the manuscript. An example of how the status date might change but the status remains as "decision in progress" is if the journal is set up so that the editorial board member makes a decision, the decision is forwarded to the editor-in-chief, and the editor-in The status consequently changed and was "Decision in process" for 3 days, when right after it changed to "With editor". Now, ‘Decision in process’ means that the AE has made a decision on the manuscript and has communicated this decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who will make the final decision on the manuscript. You’ll be able to check the evidence you’ve filed online and any additional evidence we’ve requested from you. Three weeks later, the status has changed to Decision in Process. My understanding is that the editor has made My manuscript was submitted on the 15th of June and the status was "out for review". Now, the status has changed to "AE: Not Assigned; ADM: *****; In Peer Review". The Editors have begun a decision in the system. In a performance review, evaluating an employee’s decision-making abilities is important in determining their overall effectiveness and growth potential. This is usually journal-dependent, e. Related reading: Can the status change to "Decision in process" without a request for revisions? The status of my paper is "Decision in process. Later, on October 19, it was ‘Under editor evaluation’ and on October 22, ‘Decision in process’. This is not necessarily a bad outcome! It means you won't waste time on a review It is possible that a submitted research paper already shows such serious formal deficiencies in a cusory evaluation that the scientific paper is rejected without further review process. Later, on August 29, it was ‘Under editor evaluation’. The paper is still in Under Review status. Then this decision is emailed to the author by the editor in chief. Once the editor has made the decision, it will be conveyed to you. The handling editor then looks into it and make the next step: revise/final decision/reject. @Ijaz Durrani and @Jorge P. Acceptance decisions on manuscripts can be made by the academic editor after peer review once a The status of the paper has since changed from "Under Review" to "Decision Pending", and recently, maybe 4 days ago, the status has changed to "Decision Pending Approval". All the best for the next update! Only a paper that clears this initial screening is sent for peer review; else, it is rejected. In this step, the editor carefully evaluates all the comments by the peer-reviewers and examines the manuscript. After completing internal checks, each new submission is assigned to a Section Editor. Finally, the A month is not a considerable time for review and final decision for reputable journals. All the best for the next update! decision without allocating reviewers. 6. Decision in Process: This means that the editor decision without allocating reviewers. This stage can last from a couple of minutes Results showed that researches on contextual factors effecting strategic decision-making process are either limited or have produced contradictory results, especially studies relating decision's In many ways, ethics may feel like a soft subject, a conversation that can wait when compared to other more seemingly pressing issues (a process for operations, hiring the right workers, and meeting company goals). Decision made – notification imminent: The Action Editor has My manuscript's status changed from 'With Editor' directly to 'Decision in Process' in a week, and it has remained so for over two weeks. Would you let me know If it is sent for peer review, the status changes to "Reviewers assigned" or "Under review. Decision in Process: The decision process may require some time since the editor needs to read the revised manuscript and the revisions/rebuttal from the author to make a decision. 21, 2016. What could it mean? What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? What does the status 'under editor evaluation' mean? HANDBOOK: Keep calm and However, as they replied that it was ‘under review,’ to summarize, it probably means the journal did the peer review internally. At the fist time, the handling editor required to revise the manuscript. If the initial reviews are conflicting, the Action Editor may occasionally decide to approach an additional reviewer. In other words when the handling editor of paper takes the decision and submit it in the system then the status gets changed to decision in process. This is the fourth in a series of "tips & tricks" articles on making the review process easier and quicker. As you go through the decision-making process, it’s essential to review your decision to ensure it’s the best choice for you and your business. A change to the EIC decision status without going for peer review does not always mean a reject. Their studies show that decision makers: (1) have trouble processing information; (2) use decision-making heuristics that do not maximize preferences; (3) are sensitive to context and The average number of days from manuscript submission to the initial editorial decision on the article. Usually not a good sign; a desk rejection is very likely. I haven't I had submitted a manuscript to a Springer journal. Accept with minor revisions: Also known as conditional acceptance, this decision means that the paper requires minor changes for it to be accepted. Peer reviewers are experts who volunteer their time to help improve the journal manuscripts they review—they offer authors free advice. At this stage, when the journal decision is in process, the editor will review the revised manuscript and your responses to the reviewers’ comments before making a The status date changes whenever someone does something to the paper. In the context of the journal review process, the status "Decision Rescinded" typically indicates that a previous decision made on a manuscript has been reversed or withdrawn by the editor or journal. Contact. ‘Decision pending’: The ball is in the EIC’s court now. If the status of your paper has changed to "decision in process" without first changing to "under review", it possibly means that the journal editor is yet to make a decision about whether or not to send the paper for review. You can find out where your claim, decision review, or appeal is in our review process. This is based on the AE’s recommendation. Etc. However, putting ethics on the backburner can spell trouble for any organization. Or the editor decided to terminate the review process on the strength of that one review. If your manuscript is rejected by the editor without the peer-reviewed process, please share with the community how many days you got the rejection email from the editor's office. All the best! Related reading: Does a direct 'Decision in Process' status indicate rejection? Can the status change to "Decision in process" without a request for revisions? The ‘decision in process’ status implies that your manuscript has passed through peer review and the editorial board is now making a decision. The Associate Editor is usually a member of the PLOS Computational Biology Editorial Board, but Status What it means A reviewer is examining your new evidence We received your Supplemental Claim and assigned it to a reviewer. "Reject and Resubmit" status; Decision in process; Conflict of The AE will now communicate their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who makes the final decision. Under review: The paper is with reviewers for comment or waiting for the Action Editor’s decision. This procedure will allow you to view detailed tracking information about where your manuscript is in the submission/peer-review process. It did not go for peer review. The decision may need to be confirmed by When a journal displays the “decision in process” status, it means that the editorial board is in the process of making the final decision about your paper. Actually I am not referring to the peer review process, it usually takes time, in fact, some editors after receiving the The fact that the status of your manuscript had changed from “editor assigned” to “under review” indicates that your manuscript has cleared the initial screening and reviewers were invited to review your manuscript. 3 weeks and it is over two weeks now. Related reading: Does a direct 'Decision in Process' status indicate rejection? So, do not be surprised if this happens: once the additional review is completed, the status will come back to “Required Reviews Complete. On December 1, it turned to ‘Decision in Process,’ but has been stuck at this stage for nearly six/seven weeks. If you aren’t satisfied with the results of the first option you choose, you can try another eligible option. It may also mean that they would want you to submit the manuscript to a sister journal (one in the same publisher family). 2 days ago the status changed from Under Review to Decision in Process. Usually when a paper is received for publication, the Editor in chief considers the paper and then transmits it to the suitable :) Now, you need to wait for the peer review outcome. This form of rejection (rejection without peer review) is known as desk-rejection. So, you should wait for some time to know what’s in store for your paper. The status shows "With editor" when a manuscript is going through the initial editorial screening. IEEE Access strives to maintain an expedited peer review process of only 4 to 6 weeks, however, all article submissions still undergo a thorough peer review process to ensure only high-quality articles are published. Why is it taking more than a month for desk rejection? Answer: Normally, a direct change from the "With editor" status to a "Decision in process" status does A manuscript can receive any of the following decisions: Accept Reject; Resubmit with major revisions; Resubmit with minor revisions Thus, it's not just an acceptance or rejection decision that is taken by the editor after peer review; even revise and resubmit decisions come within the scope of editorial decisions. If you're asking why "with editor" didn't show up, there's a good chance it did, but the editor made a decision in a few minutes and you didn't notice it. In many cases there is cause for another round of reviews which would 29 June 2024. This senior editor reviews the manuscript against our publication criteria and determines whether to reject or send it on to an Associate Editor for further review. The Associate Editor is usually a member of the PLOS Sustainability and Transformation Editorial Board, but occasionally a And how long did it take to publish after acceptance? Will be a great help. The “decision in process” only lasts a few days to a week. Through the peer-review process, manuscripts should become: If an Editor, Editorial Board Member, or employee submits a manuscript, it is assigned to an independent Editor who will handle the peer review, and details of the review process, beyond the anonymized review and decision, are not accessible to Choose your reject decision term wisely - for the benefit of the author, their work, and the research community. After major revision, two reviewers gave me minor revision (only change one word) and the editor was pleased to The “decision in process” status means that the editor is finally deciding on whether they will publish your paper or not based on their own review or a peer review. Does this mean a rejection: Not always. On the 27th of June, the status changed to decision pending. " However, if the editor feels that a manuscript does not match the scope or standards required by the journal, it is rejected without review and the status changes to "Decision in process" from "With Editor. Does that mean desk rejection, or is there a chance that it can still undergo the peer review process? The turnaround time (TAT) for this journal is 2. ” 7. While the decision-making process is typically broken down into seven steps, there may be variations depending on factors like individual preferences, the As you may have got a sense, a manuscript being in or going into Decision in Process from Day 1 usually does not augur well. When a paper receives a minor revision decision, it might not be sent for a second round of peer review; usually, the editor goes through the revisions and After completing internal checks, each new submission is assigned to a Section Editor. What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? What does the status 'under editor evaluation' mean? HANDBOOK: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses; Queries to the Editor Awaiting EIC Decision without assigning reviews. However, note the use of the word ‘recommendation. The ‘Decision in Process’ status after the ‘Required Review Completed’ status means that the associate editor (AE), who has been handling your manuscript all this time, has made a decision on your paper based on the peer review comments and your changes, and has now communicated their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who will make To ensure an efficient and effective peer-review process, the same reviewers will be invited to review the resubmitted manuscript. Your Supplemental Claim was closed We closed your Supplemental Claim. Unfortunately, this seems to indicate that your paper will be desk rejected, that is rejected without peer review. Your paper seems to be progressing through the How Long Does Decision in Process Take? The whole process of manuscript reviewing takes around 4-8 weeks, in my experience. 18, 2017, and then “Decision in Process” on Jan. The EiC makes the final decision (as we just mentioned), and they may well rescind the AE’s decision. What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? What does the status 'under editor evaluation' mean? HANDBOOK: Keep calm and wait: A The status "required reviews completed back to editor assigned" in a manuscript submission system typically means that the peer review process for the manuscript has been completed, and the Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that the manuscript passed the admin and/or Associate Editor (AE) check and was awaiting peer review. " For insights into peer review and journal decision-making that may help address any remaining worries, you may wish to go through the following articles: Peer review process and editorial decision making at journals; How a journal editor reaches a decision on a manuscript after peer review; Hope that helps. If you have questions at any stage in the The Manuscript Status on ScholarOne displays “Waiting for Reviewers’ Scores” if one or more agreed reviewers have not submitted their scores. Its mean editor has drafted a decision about your paper, which is yet to be finalized/posted. what does it mean? Answer: Hi Abhishek – welcome to the forum! Straight off, I understand your concern. g. the status moves when 2 reviews have arrived, but only one reviewer submitted a review and the editor's making a decision anyway. The AE then conveys their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who makes the final decision. Much like the process of businesses creating the What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? Who takes the final decision on a manuscript: the AE or EiC? Editorial decision-making: what are the possible outcomes for a manuscript? of your manuscript’s acceptance by learning how to prepare a manuscript for journal submission and handle the peer review process. Whatever it is, you should be informed of the decision soon. 70% of unsolicited manuscripts are rejected without review beyond that of the editor. The reviewer’s name may also be disclosed alongside the article if it is published After completing internal checks, each new submission is assigned to a Deputy Editor or one of the Editors-in-Chief. In Elsevier, particularly, before this happens, the status of the article shows Decision in Process. I wonder whether For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned for the next two days then again changed to under review for The peer review process for journal publication is essentially a quality control mechanism. But I believe it does not hurt to drop them an Email and ask them about the status of your paper. It is a process by which experts evaluate scholarly works, and its objective is to ensure a high quality of published science. Read this article to understand peer review and editorial decision-making process in detail. IEEE Access has a typical acceptance rate of about 30%, which is I sent an inquiry email and they said the manuscript is undergoing the peer review process normally. 2024. 2. Instances of this decision are also rather rare. For insights into that and for dealing with peer review comments, you may go through these articles: Editorial decision-making: what are the possible outcomes for a manuscript? Peer review process and editorial decision making at journals; How to respond to comments by peer reviewers; Hope Open peer review: There are lots of different types of open peer review but typically, it means the reviewers know who the authors of the article are, and the authors will learn who the reviewers are at some point during the review or publication process. This typically happens for any or all of the following reasons: the manuscript does not match the journal aims and scope (or criteria, as you have said), may not be novel enough (according to the journal), or its writing/presentation may During the peer review process your article will show a status of ‘Under Review’. About the editorial process: Manuscripts move from "Under review" to "Required Reviews Complete" when all the necessary reviews to make a decision have arrived. What does this mean and what is the probability of rejection? Decision making is an essential skill that is crucial for success at every level of an organization. In my case, I got this status two times. I submitted my manuscript to an Elsevier journal on 13th April. If the paper clears this screening, it is sent out for peer review, and the status changes to "Reviewers assigned" or "Under review. I thought some revision would be required, but the status was directly changed to “Decision in Process”. After the paper was in the With Editor status for about a month, it went to Under Review for about four months. I submitted the second revision of a study to an Elsevier journal on November 11. After different status changes, the tracking system has been showing "Reviews completed" since 21/09/2017. This may be . My manuscript status is stucked at " Decision in process" for more than 3 weeks now and the editor and the journal office says the editor has submitted the decision but doesnt say why such a delay. 06. " What does it indicate? Editor decided to make a decision before all the reviews have arrived. 22. The journal’s editorial assistant will check that the manuscript and associated materials are complete. ’ This is only a recommendation, and not a decision. Step 7: Review Your Decision. " I have submitted my article 3 months ago and I did not receive any revision. But how does the editor actually take the decision on a manuscript? This article explains the sequence of events that lead from peer review to editorial decision making: how the AE procures the completed reviews, assesses them, and finally comes to a decision on whether to Peer review is a positive process. ” Once the additional review is completed, the status will return to “Required Reviews Complete. Thank you for the information Profs. The status became “Under Editor Evaluation” on Jan. The status “under review” means that the reviewers had accepted the invitation and peer review process had begun. If your manuscript is sent to reviewers, please share with the Hi, it depends from the Journal but normally you can wait more days. The To get to your query straight away, the ‘Decision in Process’ means that the Editor-in-Chief (EIC) is making a decision on the manuscript. The corresponding author can check the status of a submitted manuscript at anytime in our submission and helps to reinforce the validity of your research by displaying the thoroughness of the peer review process it has undergone. TMI allows reviewers three weeks – may be extended per request – to complete the review. ' For insights into peer review and journal decision-making that may help address any remaining worries, you may wish to go through the following articles: Peer review process and editorial decision making at journals; How a journal editor reaches a decision on a manuscript after peer review; Hope that helps. As it’s happening before peer review, it If you have submitted your manuscript to an Editorial Manager journal but you have not yet received a final decision, you can check its status online. The “decision in process” status means that the editor is finally deciding on whether they will publish I submitted a paper to Elsevier on Oct. Arenas. At this stage when the journal decision is in process, the editor will go through the revised manuscript and your replies to the reviewer comments before coming to a decision. “Decision in Process” is also a way for the handling editor to communicate their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who makes the final decision on the manuscript. Decisions on appeals are final without exception. This 4. Subscribe and get The legacy VA appeals process has changed to the decision review process. You should also consider the amount of time the journal editor needs for gathering all comments and final decision. And at the second time, the status changed to "decision in process". The status of your paper will be displayed in a tabular view. What does it mean? Detailed It means they're making a decision without peer review. Again, on September 28, the status was ‘Under review’. Decision made – notification imminent: The Action Editor has Answer: Decision in process status comes into the picture when the final decision is taken by the chief editor/editor in chief. The Associate Editor is usually a member of the PLOS Digital Health Editorial Board, but occasionally a Guest Editor is invited Is it possible that the manuscript is in peer review without assigning the AE? I submitted a paper to IEEE Transactions. As the manuscript has gone for a peer review and then for a decision by the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), indicated by the ‘Decision in Process’ status, you are concerned that the decision will be to reject – that’s why it’s not coming to you for a revision, either major or minor. However, till date, I have not received a decision. I have written an email to editor, who replied that the paper is waiting for the editor's decision. Check the status of your VA claim, decision review, or appeal online. TMI’s average turnaround time, from initial submission to decision, is about 7-weeks. The best-known critique of the rational choice model within JDM comes from the “Heuristics and Biases” school of research (Tversky 1972; Kahneman & Tversky 1979; Tversky & Kahneman 1981). ). Awaiting Final Decision: This is the decision by the Editor-in-Chief (EIC). What does the status of my submission mean in Editorial Manager? How can I track the status of my submitted article? Video Guide: Co-Author Verification in Editorial Manager - FAQs ; When can I expect a decision from the Editor? Video Guide: Using the “Track your submission” service In this case, the status changing from "out for review" to "with editor" in a day could either mean that the peer review has actually happened that fast or that the manuscript has been returned without a review possibly because the peer reviewer is unable to review the paper for some reason (unavailability, content, etc. On the same day the status changes to "out for review" again. The status was ‘Under review’ for a week. If so, it seems to have gone from this decision to awaiting a decision This status implies that the referee have submitted his/her report. Editor Decision. This could be for all sorts of reasons, e. You can also check these details: Any evidence you’ve filed A manuscript was submitted to one of the journal in springer on 28/04/2017. My submitted manuscript was showing 'With Editor' status for 20 days and it directly changed to 'Decision in Process' without 'Under Review'. This often, but not always, changes the status. Is it a bad sign? In such cases, the status might return to “Under Review. Please let me know the meaning of 'Decision in process. Thus, you need not worry as the current status of your manuscript does not indicate any negative outcome. In this light, a journal’s “Decision in Process” status indicates that the editorial board is still currently considering your submission before they make a final decision. If there is a decision before it was sent to reviewers, it usually means a desk-rejection. suddenly the status changed to "decision pending" and has been for two days. Please see our guidelines for initial submission to make sure that you provide us with all Stages of Peer Review Stages of Peer Review from Submission to Accept/Reject Decision. Describes the editorial policy and process of peer manuscript review of American Psychologist (AP). Coming to your query, Decision in Process typically means that the associate editor (AE) has gone through the peer review comments, arrived at a decision on the manuscript based on the comments, and then conveyed I submitted a paper to Journal of comparative physiology-B. For three weeks, the status had been "AE: Not Assigned; ADM: *****; Submitted". The dashboard status is showing that the paper is under review but the editor has given the decision The strategy-making process exists in three basic modes: the entrepreneurial mode, where bold decisions are taken by a powerful decision-maker; the adaptive mode, where a coalition of decision In all these situations, the status can remain ‘Required Reviews Completed’, but as you understand now without meaning that the review of your paper has been completed. Click on "Check Status" link under More Manuscript Info and Tools, then scroll down to the bottom of the Detailed Status Information page. If you disagree with a VA benefit or claim decision, you can choose from 3 decision review options (Supplemental Claim, Higher-Level Review, or Board Appeal) to continue your case. On May 28, it was ‘Under review’. zqpley yyjg rlkjb luro hyxm sczk dvofbx yywsxkzr zzihu entoyqn